The subject matter of production of bioengineered food for population is a fairly debatable and equally delicate one, with a number of appealing and disturbing aspects that I will outline in this essay.

  On the one hand, development of genetically engineered crops can provide several advantages. One virtue is that it speeds up the process of breeding plants. This, in turn, boosts financial gains coming from agricultural industry within a specific period of time. An additional benefit would be improving the nutritional value of food; people no longer need to spend and consume much money and food, yet they can absorb all essential nutrients a healthy body requires. A further distinct advantage would be that a genetically enhanced product can feature biological characteristics that a natural or organic product normally lacks. The clear example of such desirable qualities is resistance to diseases or pests.

  There is another dark side to this debate, however. The most manifest disadvantage of such genetically altered or processed food would be that many people seriously doubt their safety. Rather, they prefer to purchase organic product whose cultivation are compliant with conventional standards of farming. Furthermore, there is research to support the notion that GM produce can be potentially harmful to public health by causing mild or serious diseases. On top of these complications, continuing protests of religious communities against research into and use of bioengineered crops, which are creating a rift within society, is one more worrisome drawback.

  In sum, although changing the DNA sequences of farming products for richer harvest can bring about the substantial financial as well as health-related profits, it can inarguably result in ethical and religious conflicts in society. On balance, it seems that it is a mixed blessing, which no one can definitively vote in favor of or against.